Appearance
🛠 Workshop Buổi 12: Hoàn thiện Valuation Deck
"A model is only as good as its communication. The best analysis in the world is useless if no one understands it."
🎯 Mục tiêu Workshop
| # | Mục tiêu | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finalize Excel Model | 3-Statement + DCF + Comps integrated |
| 2 | Build PowerPoint Deck | 15–20 slides chuẩn ER/IB format |
| 3 | Peer Review | Cross-audit model + slides |
| 4 | Prepare 15-minute pitch | Script + Q&A preparation |
Thời lượng: 180 phút (3 giờ) Deliverable: Complete Excel Model + PowerPoint Deck + Ready to present
Bước 1: Finalize Excel Model (60 phút)
1.1 Tích hợp từ các buổi trước
Model cuối cùng tích hợp tất cả components đã build:
| Tab | Source | Status | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assumptions | Buổi 10 | Finalize growth rates, margins, WC drivers | ☐ |
| Income Statement | Buổi 10 | 3Y historical + 5Y projection | ☐ |
| Balance Sheet | Buổi 10 | Full build, A = L + E check | ☐ |
| Cash Flow | Buổi 10 | CFO + CFI + CFF, ending cash → BS | ☐ |
| DCF | Buổi 5 | FCFF, WACC, Terminal Value, EV bridge | ☐ |
| WACC | Buổi 8 | CAPM, Beta, Cost of Debt, weights | ☐ |
| Comps | Buổi 6 | 5+ peers, EV/EBITDA, P/E, implied valuation | ☐ |
| Sensitivity | Buổi 5 | 2-way data table: WACC × g | ☐ |
| Football Field | Buổi 6 | Chart data + horizontal bar chart | ☐ |
| Error Checks | New | Balance check, circular toggle, #REF scan | ☐ |
1.2 Error Check Tab
Tạo tab "Checks" với các automated checks:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ERROR CHECKS │
│ │
│ 1. Balance Sheet Check │
│ FY2022: A - (L+E) = 0 ✅ │
│ FY2023: A - (L+E) = 0 ✅ │
│ FY2024E: A - (L+E) = 0 ✅ │
│ FY2025E: A - (L+E) = 0 ✅ │
│ │
│ 2. Cash Reconciliation │
│ CF Ending Cash = BS Cash? ✅ │
│ │
│ 3. Circular Reference Toggle │
│ Circularity ON/OFF: [ON] ✅ │
│ Interest matches Debt Schedule? ✅ │
│ │
│ 4. #REF! / #DIV/0! Scan │
│ Errors found: 0 ✅ │
│ │
│ 5. Negative Cash Check │
│ Min cash any period: 2,150 tỷ ✅ │
│ │
│ OVERALL STATUS: ██ ALL CLEAR ██ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘Excel formula cho Balance Check:
=IF(ABS(Total_Assets - Total_Liabilities - Total_Equity) < 0.01, "✅", "❌ IMBALANCE!")1.3 Final Model Hygiene
| Rule | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Color coding | Blue = input, Black = formula, Green = cross-tab link |
| One formula per row | Drag across periods, don't rewrite formulas |
| No hardcoded numbers | Link everything to Assumptions tab |
| Units | Header row: "VND billions" or "tỷ VND" consistently |
| Number format | Thousands separator, 1 decimal for ratios, 0 for VND |
| Print area | Set for each tab — landscape for financial tables |
Bước 2: Build PowerPoint Deck (50 phút)
2.1 Template Structure — 20 Slides
| Slide # | Title | Content | Time in Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover Page | Company, Analyst, Date, Recommendation | 0:00 |
| 2 | Executive Summary | Key metrics table + thesis + risks | 0:00–1:00 |
| 3 | Investment Thesis | 3 numbered bullets with data | 1:00–2:30 |
| 4 | Industry Overview | Market size, growth trends | 2:30–4:00 |
| 5 | Competitive Landscape | Porter's 5 Forces / comp map | 4:00–5:00 |
| 6 | Company Overview | Business model, segments | 5:00–6:00 |
| 7 | Revenue Breakdown | Pie chart + growth by segment | 6:00–6:30 |
| 8 | Financial Summary | Revenue, margins, ROE trend | 6:30–7:30 |
| 9 | DuPont Analysis | 3-factor waterfall chart | 7:30–8:00 |
| 10 | Peer Comparison | Key ratios vs. comps (spider/table) | 8:00–8:30 |
| 11 | Red Flags & Quality | Clean/watch items | 8:30–9:00 |
| 12 | DCF Overview | Assumptions + FCFF build-up | 9:00–10:00 |
| 13 | DCF Bridge | EV → Equity Value → Price/Share | 10:00–10:30 |
| 14 | Sensitivity Table | WACC × g color-coded | 10:30–11:00 |
| 15 | Trading Comps | Peer multiples + implied valuation | 11:00–11:30 |
| 16 | Football Field | Horizontal bar chart — all methods | 11:30–12:00 |
| 17 | Target Price | Weighted derivation | 12:00–12:30 |
| 18 | Catalysts | 3–4 events with timeline | 12:30–13:00 |
| 19 | Risks & Mitigants | 2-column: risk + mitigation | 13:00–14:00 |
| 20 | Recommendation | BUY/SELL/HOLD — closing statement | 14:00–15:00 |
2.2 Slide Design Rules
| Rule | Do | Don't |
|---|---|---|
| Text | 6 bullet points max per slide | Paragraphs of text |
| Font size | ≥ 18pt body, ≥ 24pt heading | < 14pt |
| Charts | 1 chart per slide, message title | Multiple cluttered charts |
| Colors | 2–3 colors max, consistent palette | Rainbow colors |
| Data | Source cited on every data slide | Unsourced claims |
| Animation | None or minimal | Excessive transitions |
2.3 Key Slides — Design Examples
Slide 2: Executive Summary
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ FPT Corporation (HOSE: FPT) │
│ ██ BUY ██ Target: 118,000 VND +24% │
│ │
│ ┌─────────────┬─────────┬─────────┐ │
│ │ Metric │ FY2023 │ FY2024E │ │
│ │ Revenue │ 52,349 │ 62,000 │ │
│ │ EBITDA Mgn │ 16.2% │ 17.5% │ │
│ │ P/E │ 20.2x │ 16.0x │ │
│ │ EV/EBITDA │ 13.5x │ 11.2x │ │
│ │ ROE │ 24.8% │ 26.1% │ │
│ └─────────────┴─────────┴─────────┘ │
│ │
│ Thesis: │
│ 1. AI/DX demand → Software +25% YoY │
│ 2. Margin expansion from automation │
│ 3. Discount vs. regional IT peers │
│ │
│ Risks: FX, talent retention, Japan GDP │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘Slide 16: Football Field
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Valuation Summary — Football Field │
│ │
│ 52-Week ├▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓┤ │
│ 72K ──── 105K │
│ │
│ DCF ├▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓┤ │
│ 79K ─────── 119K │
│ │
│ Comps ├▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓┤ │
│ 85K ──── 112K │
│ │
│ Current: 95K ▲ Target: 118K ▲ │
│ │
│ → Upside +24% to target price │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘Bước 3: Peer Review (30 phút)
3.1 Quy trình
- Swap models: Đổi file Excel + PPT với peer/nhóm khác
- Audit formulas: Trace key formulas, check links
- Challenge assumptions: Tại sao growth 18%? Tại sao WACC 10%?
- Format check: Color coding, balance check, chart quality
- Write feedback: 3 strengths + 3 improvements
3.2 Peer Review Checklist
Excel Model:
| # | Item | Reviewer Check |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BS balances all periods? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 2 | Cash Flow → BS cash reconciles? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 3 | FCFF formula correct? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 4 | WACC inputs sourced? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 5 | Terminal Value reasonable (≤ 80% EV)? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 6 | Sensitivity table functional? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 7 | Color coding maintained? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 8 | No #REF! or #DIV/0! errors? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
PowerPoint Deck:
| # | Item | Reviewer Check |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Executive Summary standalone? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 2 | Recommendation clear (BUY/SELL/HOLD)? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 3 | Target Price with derivation? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 4 | Football Field chart included? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 5 | Risks acknowledged? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 6 | Charts have message titles? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 7 | Font size ≥ 18pt? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
| 8 | Sources cited? | ☐ OK / ☐ Issue |
3.3 Feedback Template
PEER REVIEW FEEDBACK
Reviewer: _______________
Team/Analyst: _______________
3 STRENGTHS:
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________
3 IMPROVEMENTS:
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________
CRITICAL ISSUE (if any):
_______________
OVERALL: ☐ Ready to present ☐ Minor fixes ☐ Major revision neededBước 4: Prepare 15-Minute Pitch (40 phút)
4.1 Script Outline
| Time | Section | Key Message | Slides |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0:00–1:00 | Opening | Hook + Recommendation | 1–2 |
| 1:00–3:00 | Thesis | 3 reasons to BUY | 3 |
| 3:00–5:00 | Industry | Why this sector, why now | 4–5 |
| 5:00–7:00 | Company | Business model deep-dive | 6–7 |
| 7:00–9:00 | Financials | Performance + ratios | 8–11 |
| 9:00–12:00 | Valuation | DCF + Comps + Football Field | 12–16 |
| 12:00–13:00 | Target Price | Derivation + catalysts | 17–18 |
| 13:00–14:00 | Risks | Top risks + mitigants | 19 |
| 14:00–15:00 | Closing | Recommendation restate | 20 |
4.2 Opening Hook Examples
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Data hook | "FPT đang giao dịch ở P/E 20x — trong khi Infosys ở 25x, với growth chỉ bằng 2/3." |
| Question hook | "Nếu AI thay đổi mọi ngành — công ty IT nào ở Việt Nam benefit nhất?" |
| Contrast hook | "Market says FPT fairly valued. We disagree — here's why." |
| News hook | "Tuần trước, FPT ký hợp đồng $200M với đối tác Nhật. Đây mới chỉ là bắt đầu." |
4.3 Q&A Preparation — Top 15 Questions
| # | Question | Prepared Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | "What's your bear case?" | Bear: WACC 11%, g 2% → TP 74,000 VND (−22%) |
| 2 | "Why BUY not HOLD?" | 24% upside > 15% hurdle, 3 catalysts within 12 months |
| 3 | "WACC quá thấp/cao?" | Sourced: Rf=4.5% (TPCP 10Y), β=0.95 (regression), ERP=8% (Damodaran) |
| 4 | "Terminal Value quá lớn?" | TV = 77% EV, within 60–80% norm. Cross-check: Exit 13x EBITDA → similar |
| 5 | "Tại sao không dùng P/E primary?" | P/E bị distort bởi capital structure. EV/EBITDA neutral |
| 6 | "Beta regression đáng tin?" | 60-month monthly returns, R² = 0.35. Cross-check: bottom-up β = 0.90 |
| 7 | "Growth 18% sustainable?" | FPT Software CAGR 23%, global DX market growing 20%+. Conservative vs. history |
| 8 | "FX risk mitigation?" | 40% revenue in USD → natural hedge. Plus forward contracts |
| 9 | "Tại sao peer group này?" | Same industry (IT services), similar size ($1–5B), APAC geography |
| 10 | "What if Japan enters recession?" | Japan = 55% of FPT Software revenue. Bear scenario includes −10% Japan IT spend |
| 11 | "Margin expansion realistic?" | AI/automation reducing delivery cost → observed at Infosys +200bps over 3 years |
| 12 | "Dividend policy?" | FPT payout ~30%. Not a dividend story — growth reinvestment |
| 13 | "Capital allocation concern?" | Education segment growing but ROE lower. Management guided to cap at 10% revenue |
| 14 | "ESG considerations?" | Carbon neutral target 2040. Employee training investment top VN. |
| 15 | "Position sizing?" | 3–5% of portfolio — high conviction but VN market premium for illiquidity |
4.4 Presentation Tips
| Tip | Chi tiết |
|---|---|
| Eye contact | Nhìn audience, không nhìn slide |
| Body language | Đứng thẳng, tay mở, di chuyển nhẹ |
| Voice | Rõ ràng, pace vừa phải, pause ở key points |
| Slide navigation | Thuộc thứ tự, không cần nhìn lại |
| Timer | Set timer 15 phút, practice 3 lần trước |
| Team transition | Nếu nhóm — chuyển người mượt, không awkward pause |
| Q&A | Lắng nghe hết câu hỏi → pause 2 giây → trả lời |
📋 Deliverables Checklist
Excel Model
| Component | Status |
|---|---|
| Assumptions tab | ☐ |
| Income Statement (3Y hist + 5Y forecast) | ☐ |
| Balance Sheet (balances checked) | ☐ |
| Cash Flow Statement (reconciled) | ☐ |
| WACC Calculation | ☐ |
| DCF (FCFF, TV, EV bridge) | ☐ |
| Comps (≥5 peers) | ☐ |
| Sensitivity (2-way table) | ☐ |
| Football Field data | ☐ |
| Error Checks tab | ☐ |
PowerPoint Deck
| Component | Status |
|---|---|
| Cover Page | ☐ |
| Executive Summary | ☐ |
| Investment Thesis (3 bullets) | ☐ |
| Industry + Company (4 slides) | ☐ |
| Financial Analysis (4 slides) | ☐ |
| DCF + Comps + Sensitivity (4 slides) | ☐ |
| Football Field Chart | ☐ |
| Target Price derivation | ☐ |
| Catalysts + Risks | ☐ |
| Recommendation (closing slide) | ☐ |
Pitch Preparation
| Component | Status |
|---|---|
| Script outline (15 min) | ☐ |
| Opening hook prepared | ☐ |
| Q&A prep (≥10 questions) | ☐ |
| Practice run #1 (solo) | ☐ |
| Practice run #2 (with peer) | ☐ |
| Practice run #3 (timed) | ☐ |
✅ Rubric đánh giá
| Tiêu chí | Xuất sắc (A) | Khá (B) | Đạt (C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model (30%) | BS balances, no errors, professional format, all tabs complete | Minor issues, mostly complete | Functional but messy |
| Valuation (25%) | DCF + Comps + Sensitivity + Football Field, well-justified | 2 methods + sensitivity | 1 method only |
| Slides (20%) | 20 slides, IBCS quality, message titles, sourced | 15+ slides, professional | Basic slides |
| Pitch (15%) | 15 min, confident, handles Q&A well | Good delivery, some Q&A gaps | Reads slides |
| Analysis (10%) | Industry + Company + Risk fully covered | Mostly covered | Surface level |
🧭 Điều hướng
| Nội dung | Link |
|---|---|
| 📘 Bài học chính | Capstone — Full Valuation Deck |
| 📝 Blog | Từ sinh viên đến Analyst |
| 🧠 Case Study | Goldman Sachs ER · FPT Deck · CFA Research Challenge |
| 🏆 Tiêu chuẩn | CFA Research Challenge · IBCS · ER Format |
| 🎮 Mini Game | Pitch Competition |